Cervical Cancer Vaccination – Do Your Research
With deaths, severe adverse reactions and absolutely NO research showing the effectiveness of the cervical cancer vaccination, it makes you wonder why the Australian government is spending $436million dollars on making the cervical cancer vaccine free for females aged between 12 and 26.
On the Australian Cancer Council website, they provide a fact sheet with information on the cervical cancer vaccination.
“Since the vaccine is new, more studies need to be done.”
More studies need to be done?? Shouldn’t every single study imaginable, on women with different lifestyle choices, illnesses and health concerns be conducted to prove the safety and effectiveness of the vaccination prior to mass vaccinating women all over the world?
Maybe they presume that because there is a current broad range use of vaccinations, there is no reason to undertake studies to prove the effectiveness of new vaccinations, or maybe they are too afraid to have results show otherwise. Considering the fact that the company that created the cervical cancer vaccination conducted the studies, this later thought is most likely the correct one. The cervical cancer vaccination research involved testing on women with a healthy immune system, this excluded all women who had been found to be infected with HPV-16 (believed to be found in 50% of cervical cancer victims), who had a history of cervical lesions and who had vary few sexual partners. In other words, the test subjects for this vaccination where women who where at the lowest risk of developing cervical cancer.
In addition, it’s important to find out how long the studies where conducted for. One would hope that studies on a vaccination would be over a lifetime for that person, considering the ingredients making up the vaccine will be in the person’s blood stream for their entire life. However the longest study conducted on the cervical cancer vaccination was four years.
When looking back on past vaccinations, the Polio vaccination is one most people will refer to when referencing the benefits of vaccinations, for its roll in the decline and eradication of the Polio virus.
Facts however, do not support the link between the decline of the Polio virus with the Polio vaccination, as the decline was already taking place before the vaccination had been introduced.
Jonas Salk, the man who created the Polio vaccination, in 1977 stated that the only cases of Polio now seen is the result of the Polio vaccination, and not from the disease itself. Of every person who could possibly come out and state that the Polio vaccination is now the only cause of Polio seen today, the creator himself would be the last person you would think to ever admit it, however, he did.
So what could this mean for the cervical cancer vaccination? Research conducted on the cervical cancer vaccination only lasted a maximum of four years, but where is the research showing that in 20, 30 or 40yrs time the vaccination won’t be the cause of some form of cervical cancer, like the Polio vaccination 20yrs later began to cause cases of Polio? There is none.
“Clinical trials across Australia and in the US have shown the vaccine to be close to 100% effective against HPV types 16 and 18.” – Australian Cancer Council Website
Close to 100% effective… that is, close to 100% effective in women who are at the lowest risk of forming cervical cancer, and over a four year period. In-fact, wouldn’t you think if the creator of the cervical cancer vaccination had solid 100% evidence that the vaccination was effective, that women would never have to worry about getting a pap smear again? Apparently not, also from the Australian Cancer Council website:
“Since no vaccine is 100% effective and this vaccine won’t provide protection against the HPV types not in the vaccine, or against existing HPV infections, regular Pap tests remain critically important to detect abnormal cell changes in the cervix.”
If a vaccination isn’t 100% effective, why bother having one in the first place? If it’s not 100% effective in eliminating every chance possible of ever developing cervical cancer wouldn’t you be at the same level of risk if you didn’t get the vaccination? Think about it. The sole reason anyone would consider being vaccinated for cervical cancer is the belief that they will never be at risk of developing cervical cancer, yet, there is no evidence showing that this is what it will do.
Another cause for concern is the components within the vaccination; aluminium, sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 and borax are all well known toxins, but are included within the cervical cancer vaccination that will be injected direct into the blood stream.
Polysorbate 80 is one component of the vaccination that has already been talked about, as rumors that the amount of the chemical included within the vaccination could lead to infertility. To claim this rumor as true or false, let’s refer to some research conducted on this particular topic. One study injected female rats with polysorbate 80 at days 4 and 7 after birth. The results showed changes to the womb lining and the vagina, as well as hormonal changes, ovary deformities and degenerative follicles. Can these side-effects be the cause of infertility? Scientists seem to believe so; a new form of contraception currently being developed aims at damaging fertility and has the suggested ingredient of polysorbate 80.
As with the cervical cancer vaccination research, in a study of 20,541 women, there were five reported cases of babies with congenital birth defects being born to women who had been given the vaccination 30days prior to becoming pregnant. Long term study on this? None. But for ease of mind, doctors will conclude that receiving the cervical cancer vaccination will protect fertility, as it will prevent the need for treatment of cervical cancer, which can lead to infertility. But as I covered earlier, there is no research in proving any protection against cervical cancer when receiving the cervical cancer vaccination, in-fact doctors will even say there isn’t a 100% guarantee on the effectiveness of the vaccination.
In conclusion, there is a lot of information available on vaccinations, both for and against. This short article I have written doesn’t even begin to scratch the surface of information available on the cervical cancer vaccination and other vaccinations, but I do hope it has shed some light on the other-side of vaccinations (the negative side) and make you want to research the topic more.
A good book I would recommend reading which covers the story of vaccinations from their beginning to the current day, is ‘The Sanctity of Human Blood: Vaccination is Not Immunization” by Tim O’Shea, and The Blood Poisoners by Lionel Dole (free).
There are also some good articles and references on Tim O’Shea’s website.
:: 
:: 
:: 
:: 
:: 
:: 
::
:: 
:: 
:: 
:: 
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Comments
Thanks John,
I wish your niece all the best in recovering from cervical cancer. I’m glad my post has helped out a bit : )
I totally agree with this article, the cervical cancer vaccination is going to cause so many health problems in the next few years. I just hope more people start to do their research and realise it’s just a money making scam for the medical industry and government before they get a shot and put their health at risk.
This is good information and you are so very right. The damage that Gardasil has already done and also that of other vaccines is about staggering. Educate yourself and stop just listening to what the CDC and FDA tell us. They dont care. Its all about profits. Doctors please wake up!!! Healthy children regressing into a brain damaged state, and or becomeing autistic. SIDS claimed deaths, right after a vaccination. Teen girls having severe adverse reactions and unrecovered from outcomes due to Gardasil; some dying. It is a game of Russian Roulette..believe it.. do the homework. The medical community depends on their peer reviewed journals and research papers to tell us the truth. The fact is that by the time that highly biased, cherry picked and lacking peer reviewed research catches up with what is already known, and gets in step with what has already been extensively studied; if we were to wait for that, we may be better off trying to wait for man to turn back into a monkey.
This is a very informative post, i was searching in google for Cervical Cancer and came across this post. My niece is suffering from Cervical Cancer, information mention in this article will greatly help me in offering her some advice
thank you